EECS 246: PROBLEM SET #2 POST-MORTEM
TA: Nathan Wedge
Total = 100 points
Distribution was as follows (N=39):
10: 00
9: 01122344444566677788899
8: 344566899
7: 2
6: 5
5: 29
Problem 2.1 [10 points]
Replacing t with a constant doesn't constitute a conclusive proof for all t. Also, several people neglected to do the entire problem.
Problem 2.2 [10 points]
In part (a), the period of cos^2(t) isn't the same as the period of cos(t).
Problem 2.4 [10 points]
Many people missed one or more of the checks in part (iii), most often the two inflection points.
Problem 2.5 [10 points]
Several people miscalculated the output in part (g) as zero everywhere.
Problem 2.6 [10 points]
Don't forget the "shift then scale" rule.
Problems 2.9-2.10 [10 points each]
Don't forget to completely label all Matlab figures.
Created: 2004-09-08.
Last Modified: 2004-09-08.